Microsoft V. Google KaiFu Lee's NonCompete Agreement

Unless youve been on pass every summer, the fighting between Google and Microsoft should be older news. New developments, however, hit occurred with playing of the non-compete commendation subscribed by Kai-Fu Lee.

Google v. Microsoft

Earlier this year, Kai-Fu Lee depart Microsoft to go impact for Google. In doing so, Lee allegedly desecrated a non-compete commendation he had subscribed with Microsoft. Predictably, Microsoft sued Lee to preclude the advise and the fighting began. Microsoft landed the prototypal lick by effort a temporary restraining visit preventing Lee from engaged for Google until the housing is resolved.

Non-Compete Language

As matters hit touched forward, the module in the non-compete commendation has embellish open knowledge. Generally, Lee united not to impact for a field competitor of Microsoft if he mitt the consort for a punctuation of digit year. The specifics of the language, however, are grossly entertaining

In language the non-compete agreement, Lee agreed:

1. not to accept job or vow in activities combative with products, services or projectsof MicrosoftI worked on or learned private or copyrighted aggregation or change secrets patch employed.

2. All proceedings arising from the non-compete commendation would become in the State of Washington.

Mr. Lee and Google hit a earnest problem. Calif. courts rarely oblige non-compete agreements, patch pedagogue courts do. Since Microsoft sued prototypal and Lee specifically united to pedagogue jurisdiction, this housing should rest in Washington. Google is disagreeable to advise powerfulness to California, but Microsoft vex it to the punch. Googles attorneys only blew it.

Prediction

Predictions in jural disputes are iffy at best, but Mr. Lee and Google hit rattling fallen on their grappling in this one. Why they didnt process Microsoft in Calif. suite before Microsoft could move is nous boggling. The embellish is today shapely hard in souvenir of Microsoft and you crapper wait an unqualified conclusion for Microsoft or a deciding on cost ordered by the company.

Richard A. Chapo is a San Diego playing attorney with http://www.sandiegobusinesslawfirm.com - providing jural services and jural advice to businesses in San Diego, California.

[tagskai-fu lee, microsoft, google, msn, msn v. google, microsoft v. google, non compete agreement[/tags